Liability for damage from defective products – Supplier’s liability pursuant to art. 4 d.p.r. no. 224 of 1988 (now art. 116 of Legislative Decree no. 206 of 2005) – Prerequisites – Supplier with name, trademark or other distinctive sign coinciding in whole or in part with that of the manufacturer – Sufficiency – Material affixing on the product such signs – Necessity – Reference for a preliminary ruling to the CJEU pursuant to art. 267 TFEU.<\/p>\n
The Third Civil Section, in terms of liability for damage from defective products, has ordered the reference for a preliminary ruling to the CJEU, pursuant to art. 267 TFEU, formulating the question \u00abwhether it complies with art. 3, paragraph 1, dir. 85\/374\/EEC – and, if it is not compliant, why it is not – the interpretation that extends the responsibility of the producer to the supplier, even if the latter has not physically affixed his name, trademark or other distinctive sign on the goods , only so that the supplier has a name, a brand or other distinctive sign that coincides wholly or in part with that of the manufacturer”.<\/p>\n
Source Supreme Court of Cassation<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Liability for damage from defective products – Supplier’s liability pursuant to art. 4 d.p.r. no. 224 of 1988 (now art. 116 of Legislative Decree no. 206 of 2005) – Prerequisites – Supplier with name, trademark or other distinctive sign coinciding in whole or in part with that of the manufacturer – Sufficiency – Material affixing on the product such signs – Necessity – Reference for a preliminary ruling to the CJEU pursuant to art. 267 TFEU. The Third Civil Section, in terms of liability for damage from defective products, has ordered the reference for a preliminary ruling to the CJEU,…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[223],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n