{"id":5041,"date":"2018-06-29T07:31:53","date_gmt":"2018-06-29T05:31:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/?p=5041"},"modified":"2018-06-29T07:31:53","modified_gmt":"2018-06-29T05:31:53","slug":"banking-bank-contracts-maximum-overdraft-commission-exceeding-the-threshold-rate-l-n-108-of-1996-court-of-cassation-sec-un-judgment-n-16303-of-20-06-2018","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/banking-bank-contracts-maximum-overdraft-commission-exceeding-the-threshold-rate-l-n-108-of-1996-court-of-cassation-sec-un-judgment-n-16303-of-20-06-2018\/","title":{"rendered":"Banking, bank contracts, maximum overdraft commission, exceeding the threshold rate, l. n. 108 of 1996, Court of Cassation, Sec. Un., Judgment n. 16303 of 20\/06\/2018"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Sec. U have solved a question of maximum importance of particular importance as regards the commission of maximum overdraft, with reference to the reports made, in whole or in part, in the period prior to the entry into force of the provisions of art. 2 bis d.l. n. 185 of 2008, inserted by the l n. 2 of 2009, for the purpose of verifying the exceeding of the presumed wear threshold rate as determined according to the provisions of l. n. 108 of 1996.<\/p>\n

Source Supreme Court of Cassation<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Sec. U have solved a question of maximum importance of particular importance as regards the commission of maximum overdraft, with reference to the reports made, in whole or in part, in the period prior to the entry into force of the provisions of art. 2 bis d.l. n. 185 of 2008, inserted by the l n. 2 of 2009, for the purpose of verifying the exceeding of the presumed wear threshold rate as determined according to the provisions of l. n. 108 of 1996. Source Supreme Court of Cassation<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[223],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nBanking, bank contracts, maximum overdraft commission, exceeding the threshold rate, l. n. 108 of 1996, Court of Cassation, Sec. Un., Judgment n. 16303 of 20\/06\/2018 - Studio Legale Mazza<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/banking-bank-contracts-maximum-overdraft-commission-exceeding-the-threshold-rate-l-n-108-of-1996-court-of-cassation-sec-un-judgment-n-16303-of-20-06-2018\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Banking, bank contracts, maximum overdraft commission, exceeding the threshold rate, l. n. 108 of 1996, Court of Cassation, Sec. Un., Judgment n. 16303 of 20\/06\/2018 - Studio Legale Mazza\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Sec. U have solved a question of maximum importance of particular importance as regards the commission of maximum overdraft, with reference to the reports made, in whole or in part, in the period prior to the entry into force of the provisions of art. 2 bis d.l. n. 185 of 2008, inserted by the l n. 2 of 2009, for the purpose of verifying the exceeding of the presumed wear threshold rate as determined according to the provisions of l. n. 108 of 1996. Source Supreme Court of Cassation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/banking-bank-contracts-maximum-overdraft-commission-exceeding-the-threshold-rate-l-n-108-of-1996-court-of-cassation-sec-un-judgment-n-16303-of-20-06-2018\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Studio Legale Mazza\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-06-29T05:31:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"mazza\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Mazzalexstudio\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Mazzalexstudio\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"mazza\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/banking-bank-contracts-maximum-overdraft-commission-exceeding-the-threshold-rate-l-n-108-of-1996-court-of-cassation-sec-un-judgment-n-16303-of-20-06-2018\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/banking-bank-contracts-maximum-overdraft-commission-exceeding-the-threshold-rate-l-n-108-of-1996-court-of-cassation-sec-un-judgment-n-16303-of-20-06-2018\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"mazza\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#\/schema\/person\/731fd74080aa9fce36c989512a0171c7\"},\"headline\":\"Banking, bank contracts, maximum overdraft commission, exceeding the threshold rate, l. n. 108 of 1996, Court of Cassation, Sec. Un., Judgment n. 16303 of 20\/06\/2018\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-06-29T05:31:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-29T05:31:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/banking-bank-contracts-maximum-overdraft-commission-exceeding-the-threshold-rate-l-n-108-of-1996-court-of-cassation-sec-un-judgment-n-16303-of-20-06-2018\/\"},\"wordCount\":105,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/banking-bank-contracts-maximum-overdraft-commission-exceeding-the-threshold-rate-l-n-108-of-1996-court-of-cassation-sec-un-judgment-n-16303-of-20-06-2018\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/banking-bank-contracts-maximum-overdraft-commission-exceeding-the-threshold-rate-l-n-108-of-1996-court-of-cassation-sec-un-judgment-n-16303-of-20-06-2018\/\",\"name\":\"Banking, bank contracts, maximum overdraft commission, exceeding the threshold rate, l. n. 108 of 1996, Court of Cassation, Sec. Un., Judgment n. 16303 of 20\/06\/2018 - Studio Legale Mazza\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-06-29T05:31:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-29T05:31:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/banking-bank-contracts-maximum-overdraft-commission-exceeding-the-threshold-rate-l-n-108-of-1996-court-of-cassation-sec-un-judgment-n-16303-of-20-06-2018\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/banking-bank-contracts-maximum-overdraft-commission-exceeding-the-threshold-rate-l-n-108-of-1996-court-of-cassation-sec-un-judgment-n-16303-of-20-06-2018\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/banking-bank-contracts-maximum-overdraft-commission-exceeding-the-threshold-rate-l-n-108-of-1996-court-of-cassation-sec-un-judgment-n-16303-of-20-06-2018\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Banking, bank contracts, maximum overdraft commission, exceeding the threshold rate, l. n. 108 of 1996, Court of Cassation, Sec. Un., Judgment n. 16303 of 20\/06\/2018\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#website\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/\",\"name\":\"Studio Legale Mazza\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Studio Legale Mazza\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/logo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/logo.jpg\",\"width\":192,\"height\":193,\"caption\":\"Studio Legale Mazza\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/Mazzalexstudio\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/avv-roberto-mazza-742145151\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCovWroTPUARTm1797nKwY8A\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#\/schema\/person\/731fd74080aa9fce36c989512a0171c7\",\"name\":\"mazza\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/23793ff27b35f644e9a7b927a702b798?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/23793ff27b35f644e9a7b927a702b798?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"mazza\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Banking, bank contracts, maximum overdraft commission, exceeding the threshold rate, l. n. 108 of 1996, Court of Cassation, Sec. Un., Judgment n. 16303 of 20\/06\/2018 - Studio Legale Mazza","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/banking-bank-contracts-maximum-overdraft-commission-exceeding-the-threshold-rate-l-n-108-of-1996-court-of-cassation-sec-un-judgment-n-16303-of-20-06-2018\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Banking, bank contracts, maximum overdraft commission, exceeding the threshold rate, l. n. 108 of 1996, Court of Cassation, Sec. Un., Judgment n. 16303 of 20\/06\/2018 - Studio Legale Mazza","og_description":"The Sec. U have solved a question of maximum importance of particular importance as regards the commission of maximum overdraft, with reference to the reports made, in whole or in part, in the period prior to the entry into force of the provisions of art. 2 bis d.l. n. 185 of 2008, inserted by the l n. 2 of 2009, for the purpose of verifying the exceeding of the presumed wear threshold rate as determined according to the provisions of l. n. 108 of 1996. Source Supreme Court of Cassation","og_url":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/banking-bank-contracts-maximum-overdraft-commission-exceeding-the-threshold-rate-l-n-108-of-1996-court-of-cassation-sec-un-judgment-n-16303-of-20-06-2018\/","og_site_name":"Studio Legale Mazza","article_published_time":"2018-06-29T05:31:53+00:00","author":"mazza","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Mazzalexstudio","twitter_site":"@Mazzalexstudio","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"mazza"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/banking-bank-contracts-maximum-overdraft-commission-exceeding-the-threshold-rate-l-n-108-of-1996-court-of-cassation-sec-un-judgment-n-16303-of-20-06-2018\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/banking-bank-contracts-maximum-overdraft-commission-exceeding-the-threshold-rate-l-n-108-of-1996-court-of-cassation-sec-un-judgment-n-16303-of-20-06-2018\/"},"author":{"name":"mazza","@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#\/schema\/person\/731fd74080aa9fce36c989512a0171c7"},"headline":"Banking, bank contracts, maximum overdraft commission, exceeding the threshold rate, l. n. 108 of 1996, Court of Cassation, Sec. Un., Judgment n. 16303 of 20\/06\/2018","datePublished":"2018-06-29T05:31:53+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-29T05:31:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/banking-bank-contracts-maximum-overdraft-commission-exceeding-the-threshold-rate-l-n-108-of-1996-court-of-cassation-sec-un-judgment-n-16303-of-20-06-2018\/"},"wordCount":105,"publisher":{"@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#organization"},"articleSection":["News"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/banking-bank-contracts-maximum-overdraft-commission-exceeding-the-threshold-rate-l-n-108-of-1996-court-of-cassation-sec-un-judgment-n-16303-of-20-06-2018\/","url":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/banking-bank-contracts-maximum-overdraft-commission-exceeding-the-threshold-rate-l-n-108-of-1996-court-of-cassation-sec-un-judgment-n-16303-of-20-06-2018\/","name":"Banking, bank contracts, maximum overdraft commission, exceeding the threshold rate, l. n. 108 of 1996, Court of Cassation, Sec. Un., Judgment n. 16303 of 20\/06\/2018 - Studio Legale Mazza","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-06-29T05:31:53+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-29T05:31:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/banking-bank-contracts-maximum-overdraft-commission-exceeding-the-threshold-rate-l-n-108-of-1996-court-of-cassation-sec-un-judgment-n-16303-of-20-06-2018\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/banking-bank-contracts-maximum-overdraft-commission-exceeding-the-threshold-rate-l-n-108-of-1996-court-of-cassation-sec-un-judgment-n-16303-of-20-06-2018\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/banking-bank-contracts-maximum-overdraft-commission-exceeding-the-threshold-rate-l-n-108-of-1996-court-of-cassation-sec-un-judgment-n-16303-of-20-06-2018\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Banking, bank contracts, maximum overdraft commission, exceeding the threshold rate, l. n. 108 of 1996, Court of Cassation, Sec. Un., Judgment n. 16303 of 20\/06\/2018"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#website","url":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/","name":"Studio Legale Mazza","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#organization","name":"Studio Legale Mazza","url":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/logo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/logo.jpg","width":192,"height":193,"caption":"Studio Legale Mazza"},"image":{"@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/twitter.com\/Mazzalexstudio","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/avv-roberto-mazza-742145151\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCovWroTPUARTm1797nKwY8A"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#\/schema\/person\/731fd74080aa9fce36c989512a0171c7","name":"mazza","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/23793ff27b35f644e9a7b927a702b798?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/23793ff27b35f644e9a7b927a702b798?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"mazza"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5041"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5041"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5041\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5042,"href":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5041\/revisions\/5042"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5041"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5041"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5041"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}