{"id":4049,"date":"2017-11-20T11:34:00","date_gmt":"2017-11-20T10:34:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/?p=4049"},"modified":"2017-11-21T12:18:01","modified_gmt":"2017-11-21T11:18:01","slug":"banking-law-supreme-court-of-cassation-order-of-october-4-2017-n-2319217-there-is-no-interest-to-both-sums-and-deadlines-that-exceed-the-threshold-rate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/banking-law-supreme-court-of-cassation-order-of-october-4-2017-n-2319217-there-is-no-interest-to-both-sums-and-deadlines-that-exceed-the-threshold-rate\/","title":{"rendered":"Banking Law, Supreme Court of Cassation, Order of October 4, 2017 n. 23192\/17, there is no interest to both sums and deadlines that exceed the threshold rate"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>With regard to mortgage contract, art 1 of Law no. 108 of 1996, which provides for the fixing of a threshold rate beyond which the agreed interests are to be regarded as usurpatory, concerns both the corresponding interest and the time-limits for interim measures (Cass 04 April 2003, No 5324). The Court of First Instance was therefore wrong to hold that the threshold rate had not been exceeded in the present case only because it would not be possible to aggregate the interest at the time of the proceedings in order to ascertain whether that rate was exceeded (Cass Ord. \/ 2017, with the principle already affirmed by Cass. 14899\/2000.<\/p>\n<p>Source Supreme Court of Cassation<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"JUSTIFY\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>With regard to mortgage contract, art 1 of Law no. 108 of 1996, which provides for the fixing of a threshold rate beyond which the agreed interests are to be regarded as usurpatory, concerns both the corresponding interest and the time-limits for interim measures (Cass 04 April 2003, No 5324). The Court of First Instance was therefore wrong to hold that the threshold rate had not been exceeded in the present case only because it would not be possible to aggregate the interest at the time of the proceedings in order to ascertain whether that rate was exceeded (Cass Ord&#8230;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[223],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Banking Law, Supreme Court of Cassation, Order of October 4, 2017 n. 23192\/17, there is no interest to both sums and deadlines that exceed the threshold rate - Studio Legale Mazza<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/en\/banking-law-supreme-court-of-cassation-order-of-october-4-2017-n-2319217-there-is-no-interest-to-both-sums-and-deadlines-that-exceed-the-threshold-rate\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Banking Law, Supreme Court of Cassation, Order of October 4, 2017 n. 23192\/17, there is no interest to both sums and deadlines that exceed the threshold rate - Studio Legale Mazza\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"With regard to mortgage contract, art 1 of Law no. 108 of 1996, which provides for the fixing of a threshold rate beyond which the agreed interests are to be regarded as usurpatory, concerns both the corresponding interest and the time-limits for interim measures (Cass 04 April 2003, No 5324). The Court of First Instance was therefore wrong to hold that the threshold rate had not been exceeded in the present case only because it would not be possible to aggregate the interest at the time of the proceedings in order to ascertain whether that rate was exceeded (Cass Ord....\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/en\/banking-law-supreme-court-of-cassation-order-of-october-4-2017-n-2319217-there-is-no-interest-to-both-sums-and-deadlines-that-exceed-the-threshold-rate\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Studio Legale Mazza\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-11-20T10:34:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-21T11:18:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"mazza\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Mazzalexstudio\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Mazzalexstudio\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"mazza\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/en\/banking-law-supreme-court-of-cassation-order-of-october-4-2017-n-2319217-there-is-no-interest-to-both-sums-and-deadlines-that-exceed-the-threshold-rate\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/en\/banking-law-supreme-court-of-cassation-order-of-october-4-2017-n-2319217-there-is-no-interest-to-both-sums-and-deadlines-that-exceed-the-threshold-rate\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"mazza\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#\/schema\/person\/731fd74080aa9fce36c989512a0171c7\"},\"headline\":\"Banking Law, Supreme Court of Cassation, Order of October 4, 2017 n. 23192\/17, there is no interest to both sums and deadlines that exceed the threshold rate\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-11-20T10:34:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-21T11:18:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/en\/banking-law-supreme-court-of-cassation-order-of-october-4-2017-n-2319217-there-is-no-interest-to-both-sums-and-deadlines-that-exceed-the-threshold-rate\/\"},\"wordCount\":131,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/en\/banking-law-supreme-court-of-cassation-order-of-october-4-2017-n-2319217-there-is-no-interest-to-both-sums-and-deadlines-that-exceed-the-threshold-rate\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/en\/banking-law-supreme-court-of-cassation-order-of-october-4-2017-n-2319217-there-is-no-interest-to-both-sums-and-deadlines-that-exceed-the-threshold-rate\/\",\"name\":\"Banking Law, Supreme Court of Cassation, Order of October 4, 2017 n. 23192\/17, there is no interest to both sums and deadlines that exceed the threshold rate - Studio Legale Mazza\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-11-20T10:34:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-21T11:18:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/en\/banking-law-supreme-court-of-cassation-order-of-october-4-2017-n-2319217-there-is-no-interest-to-both-sums-and-deadlines-that-exceed-the-threshold-rate\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/en\/banking-law-supreme-court-of-cassation-order-of-october-4-2017-n-2319217-there-is-no-interest-to-both-sums-and-deadlines-that-exceed-the-threshold-rate\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/en\/banking-law-supreme-court-of-cassation-order-of-october-4-2017-n-2319217-there-is-no-interest-to-both-sums-and-deadlines-that-exceed-the-threshold-rate\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Banking Law, Supreme Court of Cassation, Order of October 4, 2017 n. 23192\/17, there is no interest to both sums and deadlines that exceed the threshold rate\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#website\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/\",\"name\":\"Studio Legale Mazza\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Studio Legale Mazza\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/logo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/logo.jpg\",\"width\":192,\"height\":193,\"caption\":\"Studio Legale Mazza\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/Mazzalexstudio\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/avv-roberto-mazza-742145151\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCovWroTPUARTm1797nKwY8A\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#\/schema\/person\/731fd74080aa9fce36c989512a0171c7\",\"name\":\"mazza\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/23793ff27b35f644e9a7b927a702b798?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/23793ff27b35f644e9a7b927a702b798?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"mazza\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Banking Law, Supreme Court of Cassation, Order of October 4, 2017 n. 23192\/17, there is no interest to both sums and deadlines that exceed the threshold rate - Studio Legale Mazza","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/en\/banking-law-supreme-court-of-cassation-order-of-october-4-2017-n-2319217-there-is-no-interest-to-both-sums-and-deadlines-that-exceed-the-threshold-rate\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Banking Law, Supreme Court of Cassation, Order of October 4, 2017 n. 23192\/17, there is no interest to both sums and deadlines that exceed the threshold rate - Studio Legale Mazza","og_description":"With regard to mortgage contract, art 1 of Law no. 108 of 1996, which provides for the fixing of a threshold rate beyond which the agreed interests are to be regarded as usurpatory, concerns both the corresponding interest and the time-limits for interim measures (Cass 04 April 2003, No 5324). The Court of First Instance was therefore wrong to hold that the threshold rate had not been exceeded in the present case only because it would not be possible to aggregate the interest at the time of the proceedings in order to ascertain whether that rate was exceeded (Cass Ord....","og_url":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/en\/banking-law-supreme-court-of-cassation-order-of-october-4-2017-n-2319217-there-is-no-interest-to-both-sums-and-deadlines-that-exceed-the-threshold-rate\/","og_site_name":"Studio Legale Mazza","article_published_time":"2017-11-20T10:34:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-21T11:18:01+00:00","author":"mazza","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Mazzalexstudio","twitter_site":"@Mazzalexstudio","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"mazza","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/en\/banking-law-supreme-court-of-cassation-order-of-october-4-2017-n-2319217-there-is-no-interest-to-both-sums-and-deadlines-that-exceed-the-threshold-rate\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/en\/banking-law-supreme-court-of-cassation-order-of-october-4-2017-n-2319217-there-is-no-interest-to-both-sums-and-deadlines-that-exceed-the-threshold-rate\/"},"author":{"name":"mazza","@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#\/schema\/person\/731fd74080aa9fce36c989512a0171c7"},"headline":"Banking Law, Supreme Court of Cassation, Order of October 4, 2017 n. 23192\/17, there is no interest to both sums and deadlines that exceed the threshold rate","datePublished":"2017-11-20T10:34:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-21T11:18:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/en\/banking-law-supreme-court-of-cassation-order-of-october-4-2017-n-2319217-there-is-no-interest-to-both-sums-and-deadlines-that-exceed-the-threshold-rate\/"},"wordCount":131,"publisher":{"@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#organization"},"articleSection":["News"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/en\/banking-law-supreme-court-of-cassation-order-of-october-4-2017-n-2319217-there-is-no-interest-to-both-sums-and-deadlines-that-exceed-the-threshold-rate\/","url":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/en\/banking-law-supreme-court-of-cassation-order-of-october-4-2017-n-2319217-there-is-no-interest-to-both-sums-and-deadlines-that-exceed-the-threshold-rate\/","name":"Banking Law, Supreme Court of Cassation, Order of October 4, 2017 n. 23192\/17, there is no interest to both sums and deadlines that exceed the threshold rate - Studio Legale Mazza","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-11-20T10:34:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-21T11:18:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/en\/banking-law-supreme-court-of-cassation-order-of-october-4-2017-n-2319217-there-is-no-interest-to-both-sums-and-deadlines-that-exceed-the-threshold-rate\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/en\/banking-law-supreme-court-of-cassation-order-of-october-4-2017-n-2319217-there-is-no-interest-to-both-sums-and-deadlines-that-exceed-the-threshold-rate\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/en\/banking-law-supreme-court-of-cassation-order-of-october-4-2017-n-2319217-there-is-no-interest-to-both-sums-and-deadlines-that-exceed-the-threshold-rate\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Banking Law, Supreme Court of Cassation, Order of October 4, 2017 n. 23192\/17, there is no interest to both sums and deadlines that exceed the threshold rate"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#website","url":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/","name":"Studio Legale Mazza","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#organization","name":"Studio Legale Mazza","url":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/logo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/logo.jpg","width":192,"height":193,"caption":"Studio Legale Mazza"},"image":{"@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/twitter.com\/Mazzalexstudio","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/avv-roberto-mazza-742145151\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCovWroTPUARTm1797nKwY8A"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#\/schema\/person\/731fd74080aa9fce36c989512a0171c7","name":"mazza","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"http:\/\/mazzalex.internet-idee.net\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/23793ff27b35f644e9a7b927a702b798?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/23793ff27b35f644e9a7b927a702b798?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"mazza"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4049"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4049"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4049\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4103,"href":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4049\/revisions\/4103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4049"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4049"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mazzalex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4049"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}